https://www.boardroombook.com/5-effective-communication-skills-in-meetings/

A boardroom review is an approach that lets a table evaluate its performance in a comprehensive way. It assists tables in identifying weaknesses in their leadership and culture and also aspects of longevity. It helps ensure that those who pay for membership at a table are equipped to fulfill their responsibilities.

This research field is in the process of development and there remain some issues. The current evidence-based evidence provides mixed results on how dissent can affect boards and their performance. While some studies show positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear results, others report negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019) and non-significant or mixed results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats, 2015; Minichilli et al. 2012) interactions between dissent as well as the board’s performance.

The literature does not provide a deeper understanding of what factors influence the dynamics of dissension. Future research needs to develop a more integrated theoretical approach to understand this phenomenon of governance. This could include the use of a configurational approach (Federo and Saz-Carranza 2018, Schiell, Lewellyn, and Yan 2023) to help researchers better understand how board attributes, processes, and contexts are connected to the necessary and sufficient causality in governance processes.

Some studies use the narrow definition of dissent but do not provide precise measurement methods. These studies are prone to measurement errors. Thus, it would be beneficial for future studies to come up with more reliable and precise dissent measurement methods.